De-confounding causal inference using latent multiple-mediator pathways
نویسندگان
چکیده
Causal effect estimation from observational data is one of the essential problems in causal inference. However, most methods rely on strong assumption that all confounders are observed, which impractical and untestable real world. We develop a mediation analysis framework inferring latent confounder for debiasing both direct indirect effects. Specifically, we introduce generalized structural equation modeling incorporates structured factors to improve goodness-of-fit model observed data, deconfound mediators outcome simultaneously. One major advantage proposed it utilizes pathway structure cause via multiple debias without requiring external information confounders. In addition, flexible terms integrating powerful nonparametric prediction algorithms while retaining interpretable theory, establish identification effects based deconfounding method. Numerical experiments simulation settings normative aging study indicate approach reduces bias
منابع مشابه
Confounding Equivalence in Causal Inference
The paper provides a simple test for deciding, from a given causal diagram, whether two sets of variables have the same bias-reducing potential under adjustment. The test requires that one of the following two conditions holds: either (1) both sets are admissible (i.e. satisfy the back-door criterion) or (2) the Markov boundaries surrounding the treatment variable are identical in both sets. We...
متن کاملUsing latent outcome trajectory classes in causal inference.
In longitudinal studies, outcome trajectories can provide important information about substantively and clinically meaningful underlying subpopulations who may also respond differently to treatments or interventions. Growth mixture analysis is an efficient way of identifying heterogeneous trajectory classes. However, given its exploratory nature, it is unclear how involvement of latent classes ...
متن کاملCausal inference in epidemiological studies with strong confounding.
One of the identifiability assumptions of causal effects defined by marginal structural model (MSM) parameters is the experimental treatment assignment (ETA) assumption. Practical violations of this assumption frequently occur in data analysis when certain exposures are rarely observed within some strata of the population. The inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) estimator is partic...
متن کاملSensitivity to Confounding in Causal Inference: From Childhood to Adulthood
A necessary condition for correctly assessing causality is the absence of confounding causes. This paper reports a pair of experiments that investigate whether people are sensitive to confounding when they infer causation. Two stories were constructed, one in which two candidate causes perfectly covaried with each other (confounded), and another in which the two candidate causes occurred indepe...
متن کاملMultiple Imputation for Causal Inference
The potential outcome framework for causal inference is fundamentally a missing data problem with a special, the so-called file-matching, pattern of missing data. Given the large body of literature on various methods for handling missing data and associated software, it will be useful to use such methods to facilitate causal inference for routine applications. This article uses the sequential r...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the American Statistical Association
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['0162-1459', '1537-274X', '2326-6228', '1522-5445']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2023.2240461